Misused honorary authorship is no excuse for quantifying the unquantifiable.
نویسنده
چکیده
Kovacs argues that honorary authorship and regarding each co-author of multi-authored papers as if they were sole authors when the performance of researchers is being evaluated by their publications mean that we should require authors to identify what proportion of each publication should be attributed to each co-author. Even if such attributions could be made reliably, such a change should not be made. Contributions to authorship cannot be validly quantified, and the relative merits of different publications are also neither equal nor validly quantifiable. Research administrators need to recognise that whatever criteria they adopt to evaluate the performance of researchers, researchers will find a way to game the system in order to maximise their personal benefit.
منابع مشابه
Fairer citation-based metrics
I describe a simple modification which can be applied to any citation count-based index (e.g. Hirsch’s h-index) quantifying a researcher’s publication output. The key idea behind the proposed approach is that the merit for the citations of a paper should be distributed amongst its authors according to their relative contributions. In addition to producing inherently fairer metrics I show that t...
متن کاملHonorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey
OBJECTIVES To assess the prevalence of honorary and ghost authors in six leading general medical journals in 2008 and compare this with the prevalence reported by authors of articles published in 1996. DESIGN Cross sectional survey using a web based questionnaire. SETTING International survey of journal authors. PARTICIPANTS Sample of corresponding authors of 896 research articles, review...
متن کاملHonorary and ghost authorship in nursing publications.
PURPOSE The purposes of this study were to (a) assess the prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in 10 leading peer-reviewed nursing journals between 2010 to 2012; (b) compare the results to prevalence reported by authors of articles published in high-impact medical journals; and (c) assess the experiences of editors in the International Academy of Nursing Editors with h...
متن کاملAuthorship criteria and disclosure of contributions: comparison of 3 general medical journals with different author contribution forms.
CONTEXT A number of general medical journals and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) request authors to disclose their contributions. Little is known about the effect of journal policies on authors' disclosure of their contributions. OBJECTIVE To determine the number of named authors who do not meet ICMJE criteria for authorship, according to their published contrib...
متن کاملAn Introduction to Honorary Authorship
سخن سردبیر Editorial مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان دوره 20، دی 1400، 1064-1063 مقدمهای بر انواع نویسندگی افتخاری An Introduction to Honorary Authorship محسن رضائیان[1] M. Rezaeian تاکنون پیرامون مسائل و مشکلاتی که ممکن است در زمینه نویسندگی مقالات علمی مطرح گردد، موضوعات گوناگونی را به رشته تحریردر آوردهایم [5-1]. ازآن جمله، پیرامون انواع گوناگون وضعیت نویسن...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of medical ethics
دوره 39 8 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013